Space Industry Cheat Sheet: Golden Dome Takes Shape, Artemis 2 Stumbles, and Commercial Space Bets Big on the Moon

The week hand­ed us a full plate, with Gold­en Dome con­tract action heat­ing up, Artemis 2 run­ning into a fresh com­pli­ca­tion, SpaceX set­ting reuse records, and two of the biggest names in com­mer­cial space qui­et­ly piv­ot­ing toward the Moon for rea­sons that go well beyond explo­ration. Let’s get into it.


Gold­en Dome Keeps Build­ing Momen­tum — and Contractors

The Gold­en Dome machine keeps rolling. On Feb­ru­ary 17, Leonar­do DRS announced it secured mul­ti­ple awards under the Mis­sile Defense Agen­cy’s $151 bil­lion SHIELD IDIQ con­tract vehi­cle, the Scal­able Home­land Inno­v­a­tive Enter­prise Lay­ered Defense pro­gram. This is not a win; it’s a seat at the table, but in the defense con­tract­ing world, that seat mat­ters enor­mous­ly. It posi­tions DRS to com­pete for future task orders where the Pen­ta­gon needs speed, mod­u­lar­i­ty, and sys­tems that can fuse sen­sor data into action­able tar­get­ing at machine speed. That’s where DRS lives, in the rugged bat­tle man­age­ment hard­ware and sen­sor-to-shoot­er plumb­ing that makes mis­sile defense func­tion as a coor­di­nat­ed sys­tem rather than a col­lec­tion of parts.

Mean­while, for­mer senior defense offi­cials marked rough­ly a year since the Gold­en Dome exec­u­tive order by mak­ing a point­ed argu­ment: geog­ra­phy is no longer a shield. For­mer Air Force Under­sec­re­tary Kari Bin­gen said as much dur­ing a C‑SPAN pan­el on Feb­ru­ary 18, fram­ing the case for space-based defense not as an ambi­tion but as a neces­si­ty against Rus­sia and Chi­na’s expand­ing arse­nals. The experts at that pan­el were clear that inte­gra­tion — link­ing sen­sors, inter­cep­tors, and com­mand-and-con­trol at machine speed — remains the hard­est prob­lem. Nobody’s pre­tend­ing this is sim­ple. But the mon­ey is flow­ing, the seats are fill­ing, and the pro­gram is tak­ing shape.

Con­gress is also press­ing hard­er. In late Jan­u­ary, law­mak­ers direct­ed the DoD to con­vert approved Gold­en Dome fund­ing into a con­crete bud­get and archi­tec­ture roadmap. One year after the exec­u­tive order, the pro­gram still lacks the detailed jus­ti­fi­ca­tion mate­ri­als and acqui­si­tion sequenc­ing need­ed to move from con­cept to an exe­cutable pro­gram. That pres­sure is not going away.

It is also worth not­ing that Space­News report­ed on Feb­ru­ary 5 that Gold­en Dome deputy pro­gram man­ag­er Mar­cia Holmes used the Mia­mi Space Sum­mit to pitch the pro­gram as a prov­ing ground for a fun­da­men­tal­ly new way the Pen­ta­gon intends to buy major sys­tems — faster, more per­for­mance-dri­ven, and with greater con­trac­tor risk-tak­ing built in. The acqui­si­tion reform angle is as impor­tant as the hard­ware angle, and indus­try would be wise to pay atten­tion to both.


SpaceX and Blue Ori­gin Take a Hard Turn Toward the Moon

In the most strate­gi­cal­ly inter­est­ing sto­ry of the week, both SpaceX and Blue Ori­gin have abrupt­ly piv­ot­ed toward lunar devel­op­ment in ways that track direct­ly with the Gold­en Dome time­line. In ear­ly Feb­ru­ary, SpaceX reversed course on its long-stand­ing Mars-first phi­los­o­phy and announced a focus on estab­lish­ing a lunar pres­ence. Blue Ori­gin qui­et­ly paused its New Shep­ard tourism pro­gram for at least two years, redi­rect­ing resources toward lunar devel­op­ment. The tim­ing of both moves is hard to ignore.

The White House issued an exec­u­tive order in Decem­ber 2025 call­ing for a mis­sile shield pro­to­type by 2028 and an Amer­i­can lunar return by 2028, with ele­ments of a per­ma­nent moon pres­ence by 2030. SpaceX is report­ed­ly in line for a $2 bil­lion Pen­ta­gon con­tract to build a 600-satel­lite con­stel­la­tion sup­port­ing Gold­en Dome track­ing and tar­get­ing. Defense offi­cials, includ­ing Space Force Vice Chief of Oper­a­tions Gen. Shawn Brat­ton, have made clear that com­mer­cial part­ner­ships are foun­da­tion­al to meet­ing those time­lines. When you fol­low the archi­tec­ture, the lunar piv­ot starts to look less like an explo­ration strat­e­gy and more like posi­tion­ing for the long game in space-based defense infrastructure.


Artemis 2 Hits Anoth­er Snag

NASA’s Artemis 2 pro­gram had a rough week. After a sec­ond wet dress rehearsal on Feb­ru­ary 19 appeared to go well, NASA announced it was tar­get­ing March 6 for launch. Then a new prob­lem sur­faced with the upper stage of the Space Launch Sys­tem rock­et, and the agency acknowl­edged it will almost assured­ly impact the March launch win­dow. This mis­sion car­ries four astro­nauts on the first crewed flight beyond low Earth orbit since Apol­lo 17 in 1972, so the stakes and the scruti­ny are both sig­nif­i­cant. NASA is trou­bleshoot­ing, and the pro­gram remains alive, but the win­dow is tight­en­ing, and the sched­ule has now bent twice in rapid succession.


SpaceX Sets a Reuse Record

On a lighter note for the reuse crowd, SpaceX had a strong Sat­ur­day. On Feb­ru­ary 21, two Fal­con 9 rock­ets launched from Cal­i­for­nia and Flori­da on the same day. The boost­er fly­ing from Cape Canaver­al, B1067, made its 33rd trip to space and back, set­ting a new reuse record for the Fal­con 9 fleet. When you con­sid­er that reusabil­i­ty was once a moon­shot idea debat­ed in engi­neer­ing con­fer­ence rooms, 33 flights on a sin­gle boost­er is worth stop­ping to appreciate.


NRO Expands Its Com­mer­cial Remote Sens­ing Stable

The Nation­al Recon­nais­sance Office award­ed three con­tracts on Feb­ru­ary 12 under its Strate­gic Com­mer­cial Enhance­ments CSO pro­gram. HEO, which cap­tures non-Earth imagery of objects in orbit, SatVu, which col­lects medi­um wave infrared imagery, and Sier­ra Neva­da Cor­po­ra­tion, which offers RF sens­ing capa­bil­i­ties, each secured awards. NRO Direc­tor Chris Scolese described it as a flex­i­ble mech­a­nism for bring­ing in new ideas and tech­nolo­gies. The move reflects the intel­li­gence com­mu­ni­ty’s sus­tained push to diver­si­fy its sens­ing port­fo­lio with com­mer­cial providers capa­ble of deliv­er­ing capa­bil­i­ties across mul­ti­ple phe­nom­e­nolo­gies, from elec­tro-opti­cal to RF and beyond.


Stoke Space Rais­es $350 Million

Stoke Space, the Wash­ing­ton-based launch start­up build­ing the ful­ly reusable Nova rock­et, closed a $350 mil­lion exten­sion round on top of the $510 mil­lion Series D it announced last Octo­ber. That’s a seri­ous war chest for a com­pa­ny that the Space Force con­sid­ers a Nation­al Secu­ri­ty Space Launch provider and that the East­ern Range is active­ly watch­ing for a poten­tial first launch lat­er this year. Stoke is build­ing toward some­thing that mat­ters for both com­mer­cial and nation­al secu­ri­ty customers.


The Bot­tom Line

The week rein­forced a theme that has been build­ing for months. Com­mer­cial space is no longer sep­a­rate from nation­al defense. It is increas­ing­ly the back­bone of it. Gold­en Dome needs the sen­sors, satel­lites, launch cadence, and com­mer­cial inte­gra­tion exper­tise that the pri­vate sec­tor can pro­vide at scale and speed. The SHIELD awards, the lunar piv­ots by SpaceX and Blue Ori­gin, the NRO’s com­mer­cial sens­ing expan­sion, and the Stoke cap­i­tal raise all point in the same direc­tion: the indus­tri­al base is orga­niz­ing itself around the defense archi­tec­ture this admin­is­tra­tion is build­ing. That is not a coin­ci­dence. That is a strategy.


Pax ab Space

Clin­ton Austin is a Senior Busi­ness Devel­op­ment Direc­tor for GDIT who cov­ers the U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Space Force, and the Mis­sile Defense Agency.

The views expressed are those of the author and do not reflect the offi­cial pol­i­cy or posi­tion of Gen­er­al Dynam­ics Infor­ma­tion Technology.

February 22, 2026

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *